California Loses HIV/AIDS Funding Because of Outdated CARE Act Allocation Formulas
Formulas Should be Based on Actual Living AIDS Cases,
Not Estimates that Undercount California's Epidemic
The existing CARE Act allocation formulas result in California receiving millions
of dollars less than its fair share of federal CARE Act funding. Your
support in correcting this disparity is vital to maintaining access to
life saving medical and support services for low income Californians
living with HIV disease.
- This disparity can be addressed by amending the CARE Act
allocation formulas to use actual living AIDS cases rather than
estimated living AIDS cases as required in current law.
- Currently,
the CARE Act requires the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention
to estimate the number of people living with AIDS using national
estimates of how long people with AIDS survive. In California, people
with HIV/AIDS are living longer than the national average, in part due
to our strong systems of care. Therefore, we are providing services to
more people than we are given credit for in the current resource
allocation formulas.
- Estimated living AIDS cases are
currently used in the formulas that determine funding allocations for
Title I (the cities hardest hit by the disease) and Title II (the
funding that comes to the state, including the AIDS Drug Assistance
Program). The use of these estimated case counts under-counts
California's living AIDS cases by approximately 30 percent and
disproportionately reduces the state's share of CARE Act funding by
over $20.5 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2005.
- The chart below
illustrates the potential effect of this change. In FY 2005, using the
current formula, California's ADAP will receive 11.79% (approximately
$90 million) of the federal ADAP earmark -- an increase of only
$404,800 over the previous year's award. If the formula used living
AIDS cases, California's share would increase to 13.75%. That 1.97%
difference could mean a projected gain of over $15.4 million in ADAP
funds and a potential $5.15 million gain in Title II base funding to
the State. The total increase to the State would be even greater, since
Title I formula allocations are similarly affected by allocation
formulas.
Hypothetical effect on Title II CARE Act funding for California FY2005
| Formula | # of AIDS Cases | Proportion of National AIDS Cases | Estimated ADAP* Earmark Allocation | Estimated Title II Base Allocation |
Current Formula:
Est. Living AIDS Cases 1994 -- 2004 |
38,148 |
11.785% |
$90,028,000 |
$ 30,910,856 |
Proposed formula:
Living AIDS Cases through 12/2003 |
55,760 |
13.750% |
$ 105,500,000 |
$ 36,064,851 |
| Difference |
17,603 |
1.965% |
$15,472,000 |
$ 5,153,995 |
The 2005 CARE Act reauthorization cycle provides a golden
opportunity for California's congressional delegation to ensure that
the federal government more fairly funds California's true HIV/AIDS
disease burden. The incorporation of living AIDS cases into CARE Act
allocation formulas will substantially increase California's proportion
of federal HIV funding and the California Congressional delegation must
advocate aggressively for this change.
Page last updated: 9/14/2007