Meet Judy Auerbach, Our New Science and Public Policy Director
Judy
Auerbach started work at the AIDS Foundation on September 18, 2006, as Deputy
Executive Director for Science and Public Policy. She came to SFAF from The
Foundation for AIDSResearch. Prior to that she worked for the
National Institutes of Health.
What
goals and priorities have you set for the public policy work of SFAF?
Being
new, my first order of business is to learn and absorb. SFAF already has strong
standing in local, state, and federal HIV/AIDS policy arenas, so my role will
be to help build on that in ways that make sense for the organization and the
communities it serves. That means maintaining our commitment to advocating for
full funding of care and treatment programs that affect people living with
HIV/AIDS in the Bay Area (particularly the Ryan White CARE Act, ADAP,
HOPWA, Medicaid, and Medi-Cal), and
working to ensure that HIV prevention policy and programs are evidence-based
and culturally appropriate.
Science
has been added to the title of the Director of Public Policy at SFAF. What does
this change signal for the work of the policy department?
I
see the addition of science as more of an expansion than a change in the policy
office's work. In recent years, HIV/AIDS policy has been deeply affected by
ideological concerns--particularly from social conservatives--at the expense of
scientific evidence. The promotion of abstinence-only-until-marriage programs
for HIV prevention in the absence of any evidence that they work is perhaps the
most extreme example. In order to truly combat HIV/AIDS locally, nationally,
and globally, we have to implement interventions that work. To know what really
works, we need rigorous research and evaluation, not moralizing. So, one area
I'd like to see us get more involved in is advocacy around HIV/AIDS research
and its application to programs and services--particularly in the area of
prevention. Given SFAF's strong ties to local research institutions, like UCSF,
and its commitment to evidence-based prevention, we are in a great position to
play a stronger role in AIDS research policy and advocacy.
Your
work in recent years has focused heavily on prevention. What do you see as the
major challenges in HIV prevention, including those related to the
"medicalization" of prevention?
There
is a lot of exciting HIV prevention research going on right now--ranging from
new biomedical technologies (vaccines, microbicides, pre-exposure prophylaxis)
to social structural and policy change interventions (expanding access to drug
addiction treatment). But funding to support this research--particularly at the
federal level--is shrinking. At the same time, the biomedical establishment
often is resistant to social and behavioral approaches, believing them to be
less rigorous. In this environment, we need to resist the temptation to pit
biomedical and behavioral/social strategies against each other, because we need
a combination approach to HIV prevention, much like we have for treatment.
What
made you decide to leave policy work in D.C. to come to San Francisco?
I
am a San Francisco
native. I was born, raised, and public school-educated here, and have always
wanted to return home. When the position at the San Francisco AIDS Foundation
emerged, it offered me a great opportunity to continue working in HIV/AIDS
science and policy for a very well-respected non-profit organization and to do
it from the city I love. I am excited about helping SFAF evolve and grow in
areas that will benefit the local community and contribute to the global fight
against AIDS.
Page last updated: 10/1/2006